• OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    should judge ideologies by their propositions.

    Okay, I see. If we are judging ideologies purely by “wouldn’t it be nice if” then anarchism is clearly superior.

    Well, on second though, no. “wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t get defeated by fascists” certainly has a pretty nice ring to it…

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Okay, I see. If we are judging ideologies purely by “wouldn’t it be nice if” then anarchism is clearly superior.

      you almost got me

      Well, on second though, no. “wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t get defeated by fascists” certainly has a pretty nice ring to it…

      i’m not saying i have a good plan. i’m saying i am suspicious of any plan that concentrates power, and i believe my suspicion is warranted.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        i’m not saying i have a good plan. i’m saying i am suspicious of any plan that concentrates power, and i believe my suspicion is warranted.

        I mean, look up the life expectancy of China vs India over time. Place your suspicion against the facts.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          The fact is that China has police and prisons and banks. I don’t know for sure but I would guess they even have landlords. That’s not my revolution.

          • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Of course it isn’t, because you don’t have a revolution. If we did things your way, we’d still be living under feudalism.

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  you know I dwelt on this a bit, and the revolution was thrown by the people and it wasn’t thrown for mercantilism. it was just against the feudal system. but what followed was mercantilism. merchants didn’t throw the revolution. I don’t know how you got the conclusion that the French revolution was a mercantilist revolution. I honestly can’t think of a single mercantilist revolution. The closest thing I can imagine are the American revolution and possibly the piracy of the 18th century.

                  • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    All of that is besides the point; the point is that none of these revolutions produced the kind of perfect anarchist society you want, and you would oppose them.