• lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    How do you define imperialism if invading other countries with the same explicit intent to annex them isn’t it?

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Cowbee means economic imperialism - using the resources / wealth of another country for yourself. So invading another country would not, by itself, be imperialism.

      I think this definition is a bit reductionist, but it’s a good starting point to ask ‘is this war for profit or some other reason?’.

      • F_State@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        but it’s a good starting point to ask ‘is this war for profit or some other reason?’.

        Always an important question to ask but if Cowbee does mean that, then they should use the modifier to signify that they are talking about economic imperialism and not about Imperialism Imperialism.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I am talking about what most leftists understand to be imperialism, which is why I called it as such, and explained it so there’s no room for doubt. The vauge concept of influence along international lines popular among apologists for imperialism as I describe it isn’t inherently a bad thing, while imperialism as I describe it is, and is the biggest obstacle to socialism globally.

          If you want to rename imperialism to something else, and call imperialism “economic imperialism” then we can do that, I’d rather talk about the actual process itself than argue about nomenclature.