ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up11
arrow-up11imageMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoIf nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·24 hours ago3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all! /j
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·23 hours agoThere’s now 4 competing standards. TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.
If nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all!
/j
There’s now 4 competing standards.
TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.