Yes im aware that my search engine choice is not the best option.

  • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    As for GDPR, California has something similar, so that also might be good. California still falls under the federal CLOUD Act and their like, though.

    If advertising companies (or really, stuff with an incentive to hunger for data) are a concern, I would not recommend the search engine Startpage. Other than that, its policies are afaik fairly decent.

    For software, I think it being OSS or at least fully audited by an independent, transparent security auditor, is crucial. You want to avoid shell companies and such whose ultimate ownership is unclear. Or CEOs with questionable histories.

    Self-hostability is a good one, though not everyone has the expertise required.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not everyone car for the same things nor has the same abilities indeed, that’s why I’m thinking of optional filters. I also want to clarify the process is important to keep in mind, namely if somebody just started to move away from BigTech or surveillance capitalism or whatever is problematic for them, it’s not the same as somebody else who dedicated their live to that a decade ago. So IMHO the hope is that people can add more and more filters whenever they feel comfortable they have the available resources to do so. It’s a journey for each of us, on different paths at difference paces.