Hi everyone,

I would like to ask your opinions on reliable cloud storage providers for media. I have a media collection that isn’t too big (about 2-3TB) that I’d like to store on the cloud since I’ll be moving in the future and don’t think I can handle multiple hard drives.

What do you suggest? Any issues I should be looking at? I came across Wasabi too, along with the more expensive Scaleway and Cloudflare R2 offerings. For now Backblaze seems fine in terms of reliability, but has anyone come across complaints from them regarding what is stored on their servers?

Thanks!

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    I won’t comment on legality of anything, but if you encrypt your data it’ll be impossible for anyone to tell what it is. Rclone has an option to do this.

    • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh absolutely, I was just wondering about the way I should do it: encrypt the entire thing into a binary blob, or each piece of media encrypted separately?

      • Unyieldingly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        encrypted separately like by album you can, even have rclone change the name and use hashes then it does not matter what you use long as they’re keep your data safe. also it is best to keep a copy in the EU and US if you can.

        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is very helpful! I would certainly be interested in something like that. How do you manage your encryption keys, and do you rotate them regularly? What does the process look like for you? The idea of changing metadata and hashing them is very appealing.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I wrote a WebDAV server you can use as the frontend for it that can encrypt everything you upload.

    https://hub.docker.com/r/sciactive/nephele

    There’s something I’m using that Backblaze doesn’t support, so I’m fixing that right now.

    Edit: Ok, I fixed the issue and updated it on Docker. It now works with Backblaze. It’s a bit slow, but I’m not sure if that’s just my connection or Backblaze.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    For a short period of time, nobody will care, especially with almost zero traffic.

    But for only up to 3tb, you can easily fit that on a single drive.

    • damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hey on that 3tb thing… can I pick and choose folders or parts of folders from the backups?

      Or, say, I want to move stuff around in folders… is that possible after the backup has reached them and is only visible to me through their web interface?

      • maiskanzler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Depends a lot on what backup software you use. Blackbase B2 ist just an S3-like object storage service. It’s the underlying software stack of many different things, one of those can be backup software. They do have their own backup solution though. But in that case B2 is the wrong product for you to look at.

  • slightperil@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve been using Backblaze B2 since 2020 for this exact purpose and I’ve had no issues. It’s been reliable and cheap to run. I stream to my phone from their servers with no issues.

    • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m very interested in your use-case: could you tell me how you achieved streaming from their servers to your mobile? What services do you use and how did you set that up?

      • Floete@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Never had a problem. According to their site, reliability seems great.

    • constantokra@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just FYI, koofr has a lifetime deal with 1tb costing $120. At about $4 a month for storj, you’re looking at a cost savings in just under 3 years. So if you intend to keep the storage, and assume koofr will still be there in 3 years, that’s another good way to go.

  • Chef_Boyargee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve got about 12 TB in Amazon Glacier. Granted, I’m using this as an offsite backup for my NAS, rather than regularly accessed for consumption.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        But isn’t that the point? You pay a low fee for inconvenient access to storage in the hope you never need it. If you have a drive failure you’d likely want to restore it all. In which case the bulk restore isn’t terrible in pricing and the other option is, losing your data.

        I guess the question of whether this is a service for you is how often you expect a NAS (that likely has redundancy) to fail, be stolen, destroyed etc. I would expect it to be less often than once every 5 years. If the price to store 12TB for 5 years and then restore 12TB after 5 years is less than the storage on other providers, then that’s a win, right? The bigger thing to consider is whether you’re happy to wait for the data to become available. But for a backup of data you want back and can wait for it’s probably still good value. Using the 12TB example.

        Backblaze, simple cost. $6x12 = $72/month which over a 5-year period would be $4320. Depending on whether upload was fast enough to incur some fees on the number of operations during backup and restore might push that up a bit. But not by any noticeable amount, I think.

        For amazon glacier I priced up (I think correctly, their pricing is overly complicated) two modes. Flexible access and deep archive. The latter is probably suitable for a NAS backup. Although of course you can only really add to it, and not easily remove/adjust files. So over time, your total stored would likely exceed the amount you actually want to keep. Some complex “diff” techniques could probably be utilised here to minimise this waste.

        Deep archive
        12288 put requests @ $0.05 = $614.40
        Storage 12288GB per month = $12.17 x 60 = $729.91
        12288 get requests @ $0.0004 = $4.92
        12288GB retrieval @ $0.0025 / GB x 12288 = $30.72 (if bulk possible)
        12288GB retrieval @ $0.02 / GB x 12288 = $245.76 (if bulk not possible)

        Total: $1379.95 / $1594.99

        Flexible
        12288 put requests @ $0.03 = $368.64
        Storage 12288GB per month = $44.24 x 60 = $2654.21
        12288 get requests @ $0.0004 = $4.92
        12288GB retrieval @ $0.01 / GB x 12288 = $122.88

        Total: $3150.65

        In my mind, if you just want to push large files you’re storing on a high capacity NAS somewhere they can be restored on some rainy day sometime in the future, deep archive can work for you. I do wonder though, if they’re storing this stuff offline on tape or something similar, how they bring back all your data at once. But, that seems to me to be their problem and not the user’s.

        Do let me know if I got any of the above wrong. This is just based on the tables on the S3 pricing site.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not sure, this wasn’t clear to me from their pricing page. There were 4 stars next to that item but the explanation for that didn’t elaborate on bulk retrieve.

            I assumed there was some minimum number of operations, or it had to be the entire backup restored to count as bulk.

            • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Without egress fees, glacier pricing is amazing. But I need to talk to someone who has actually restored from glacier to be able to consider it.

      • Chef_Boyargee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Definitely not the cheapest option. I should probably look at migrating somewhere else one of these days. At least it was easy to set up for my Synology NAS.

      • Big P@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I use it as a last resort backup for things that are worth the recall price if I lose them

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t use b2, rather; I have a personal account. Backing up 3 computers and they’ve never said anything over years So. Yeah it’s fine

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have a personal account. Backing up 3 computers and they’ve never said anything over years

      Until you need to use the backup and the process is like shit. And takes weeks to months.

      • maiskanzler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, has anyone ever actually tried restoring from then? I only remember one disgruntled redditor posting about it, but that’s about it.