I see often people say that the distro you are using doesn’t matter. One can turn any distro into another. And I do not agree with that. If that was true, why do we even have so many distributions? I always said, if distros don’t matter…

  • … why distro hop?
  • … why don’t you use Ubuntu then?
  • … why don’t you recommend Archlinux to a newcomer?
  • … why don’t you use Kali Linux as a server?
  • … why don’t you use Batocera or SteamOS as your daily driver?
  • … why do you trust a community distro more than a corporate distro? (or vice versa)

I don’t think that distros only matter to newcomers. Maybe it matters for experienced users even more.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    4 hours ago

    Where is the difference between „dedicated“ and „commitment paired with skills“???

    One are paid to do the job, the others are assumed to be doing the job.

    Sure, Debian and alike are up-to-date as are ArchLinux or Void. Oh, boy!

    You’re mistaking “up-to-date” with “patched in a timely manner.” The two are not the same. But you’re an Arch derivative user (btw) so I have low expectations. Suffice it to say that Ubuntu / RedHat / etc. back-port security patches to the packages they manage. They don’t need to be running the latest version to be patched.

    • Bogus007@lemmy.zip
      0·
      4 hours ago

      One are paid to do the job …

      I suggest you better stay then with Microsoft or Apple. Suits more your ideology.

      But you‘re an Arch derivative user

      Wrong, but keep guessing.

      Suffice it to say that Ubuntu / RedHat / etc …

      Oh, I see, you like being hold by your hands 😂🤣