• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is pretty good, though I expect even if it’s accepted it’s going to be a long journey before you can reliably use it

    If we’re adding stuff to http, it would be nice for some additional status codes, things have moved on a bit since the early days

      • calliope@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I believe you can use 422: Unprocessable Content for this.

        The request was well-formed (i.e., syntactically correct) but could not be processed.

        “I know what you said, but I’m not answering you.”