TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 22 hours ago3 income rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1655
arrow-up1655image3 income rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square58linkfedilink
minus-squaren0xy [n0xy/n0xy‘s]@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·17 hours agothere is no sexual obligation, it isn’t ruled out either
minus-squaretheolodis@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·11 hours agoRelationships fo also come wothout sexual obligations by the way, you’re not required to have sex with your partner.
minus-squareSCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoBut, as far as I know, it’s still the assumed default nature with intimate relationships. Do we want to change that?
there is no sexual obligation, it isn’t ruled out either
Relationships fo also come wothout sexual obligations by the way, you’re not required to have sex with your partner.
But, as far as I know, it’s still the assumed default nature with intimate relationships. Do we want to change that?