• hdsrob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Hate both, but I’d run Windows over Mac any day (and I develop in both regularly since I have projects that require Windows and Mac, and will for a long time). But some of this is probably due to having to use the steaming pile of crap that is Xcode.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I work at a full MacBook shop and literally nobody uses xcode 🤷‍♂️ weird reason to be against it

        • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Why would you be forced to use Xcode? I’ve been a developer (just not Swift) for years and have never used Xcode.

          • hdsrob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Swift.

            There really aren’t any other valid options for building native iOS apps.

            Luckily, we don’t really do much native iOS dev anymore, so I’m just maintaining 3 apps, and not building anything new.

            I only have to fire up the Mac for a few days every few months.

          • hdsrob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            That’s only thing I use the Mac for. Everything else is in Linux or a Windows VM (for Windows desktop apps that can’t be done outside of Visual Studio).

        • Ethan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Then why use Xcode? Mac is essentially BSD under the hood so basically any Linux CLI tool works fine, and GUI applications work reasonably well with XQuartz or whatever it’s called these days.

          • hdsrob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            There’s really no other reasonable way to build iOS apps. AppCode was a thing, but was retired a few years ago.

            • Ethan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Ok… but we’re comparing Linux, Windows, and macOS. Talking about something that can only be done on one of them is kind of pointless. You said “I’d run Windows over Mac any day” and then shat on Xcode. That makes it sound like you prefer Windows because you hate Xcode. From my perspective - the context of things that could also be done on Windows - the solution is obvious: don’t use the tool you hate.

        • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I have it and I use it daily and I absolutely hate it. The latest MacOS Tahoe is an abomination.

          It’s unstable, it sleeps monitors connected over USB-C while in use, Bluetooth audio pairing randomly doesn’t work, the virtualisation engine is crash prone, X11 integration magically stopped working a year ago and nobody seems to care.

          Permissions are impenetrable, sshfs and fuse requires a kernel module and repeated reboots and permissions to be enabled.

          I’m forced to have an OS update, requiring a reboot, to support a new model that I’m not running.

          There’s no native package manager so applications just throw their shit all over the filesystem and the alternatives, Homebrew, Anaconda and MacPorts each have system breaking problems.

          So … no. It absolutely sucks.

          And here’s the kicker, it’s still better than Microsoft Windows.

      • Ethan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        If by “Linux” you mean “Unix/BSD” and by “now” you mean “for the last quarter century”, then yes. So, no.

      • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        There’s a big difference between UNIX and Linux, and BSD can be very difference from UNIXes. I believe the macOS userland (definitely not the kernel) is based on FreeBSD 4.2.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          The Darwin kernel is based on BSD… sort of. It’s a monstrosity hybridization of an ancient version of BSD and the Mach kernel.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      but unpleasant, and you’ll be miserable the whole time.

      on the one hand, mac is often virtue signaling for hipsters, on the other hand it is a unix system, so… it often works that way.

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s a compromise if I’m not paying for it.

        Still I hate that the basic, like copy, search… Use a different key. I can rebind them, but it’s at each keyboard config and makes it annoying when trying to learn new ones