• Seppo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is it just as useless as the regular AI? It’s like crack for really stupid people.

    • m532@lemmygrad.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you can’t see any uses — then I’d be worried about your own brain capacity, not about the one of people who did find ways to use it.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nvidia sees the writing in the wall too, hence the big Nemotron effort now. They’ve been pushing open models, but no one can hear them over Altman’s lies.

    AMD… is trying.

    Some other companies have made pretty interesting efforts too, like LG and IBM, not counting stuff outside the LLM space. Even some Russian company trained a big open LLM from scratch, though it wasn’t very good TBH.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’ve released two open weights LLMs, trained on AMD hardware.

        …And yes. They are archaic jokes. I could have trained a better model if I was in charge of it, which is sad.

        And don’t even get me started on hardware and library footgunning.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh don’t mistake me, they are not consumer friendly.

        They are just trying to sell enterprise GPUs directly to “consumer” businesses and the cloud providers they use, instead of through literally fraudulent middlemen like OpenAI.

        This is what pretty much everyone with hardware is doing, including Huawei, Tenstorrent, Cerebras, even AMD. Maybe I misinterpreted you, but hardly anyone cares about individual self-hosters.

        Apple does, though. MLX is actually getting pretty cool. But they’ll always be quite insular, and they still seem detached from what the community is largely doing.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          My view is that we’re basically in the mainframe era of AI, but local models are already getting good enough to do useful stuff. Qwen 3.6 in particular is very capable, and you can do real work with it. So, extrapolate this into a couple of years into the future and it’s almost certain that we’ll be able to run models that perform as well as current frontier models locally. And that means companies are going to be much more likely to self host as well. In fact, I think you’re completely right that the immediate target will be business customers that want to self host their own models before this tech really gets to consumer grade.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah. I mean, I have a Ryzen desktop and a 2020 GPU, and Mimo 2.5 is a bit faster and mind bogglingly better than frontier models from like… two years ago? And frontier models are plateauing, I think.

            Still, my worry is that we consumer won’t HAVE any hardware. Many don’t even own a laptop these days, and it feels like they’ll just drop desktops (and work will just use thin clients) if they’re too cost prohibitive for people to buy.

  • cattywampus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s the plan, undercut funding for US AI labs, also the main reason they’ve been releasing open source models after spending millions to train them essentially getting zero financial return. They didn’t release them for the love of FOSS or just donate that capital for the lolz.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      They didn’t release them for the love of FOSS or just donate that capital for the lolz.

      no one is claiming they did. lolz.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean anybody who lived through the rise of Linux on the server should understand the benefit of releasing common infrastructure in the open and amortizing costs that way. The real difference in philosophy is that Americans companies treat the model as the product, while Chinese companies see models at infrastructure you build products on top of. You amortize the cost of deploying it at scale by sharing knowledge and iterating quickly to bring the cost down.