Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months agoThis is the waylemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down139
arrow-up179arrow-down1imageThis is the waylemmy.mlJenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareblindsight@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven’t noticed any problems running 180-ish. I’ll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that.
minus-squareCatsrules@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoDoes it matter how many files are in each torrent? I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent.
minus-squareblindsight@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI don’t think it has any effect at all, but I’m not an expert. It’s just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn’t it?
I looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven’t noticed any problems running 180-ish. I’ll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that.
Does it matter how many files are in each torrent?
I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent.
I don’t think it has any effect at all, but I’m not an expert. It’s just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn’t it?