• verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ok, good point, most languages I know use “C-style sequential function-calling” paradigm. Is there a specific idea that you have for a language that would better utilize our CPUs?

    Notation that treats asynchronous message-passing as fundamental rather than exceptional.

    I’m pretty sure there exists at least one research paper about notation for the actor pattern.

    You explain pretty well why you don’t think C is a good fit for hardware we have today, but that warrants a proposal for something better. Because I for sure don’t want to debug programs where everything is happening in parallel (as it does in pong).

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Sorry but even if this was written by a human, ai has ruined this kind of sentences for me:

    “This is Hardware Stockholm Syndrome: we optimized the hardware for C, then pointed at the hardware and said “see, C is efficient!” We forgot we made it that way.”

    Also, so-many-dashes. Even if the “human author” fact checked all the details, it reads like slop and i cant get trough it.

    • azolus@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hate that people now associate dashes with ai as I used to really like using them (distinguishing between regular, en- and em-dashes, using them to make structure clearer over regular commas).

      • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        keep doing it but add some fitting humour and a typo here and therw - and nobody will think you’re ai

        DON’T LET EM TAKE AWAY OUR DASHES

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Don’t get me wrong, i like using dashes too.

        I actually have a contract to sign which requires an em dash that changes the interpretation drastically. I am struggling to get the author to realise its importance because i received 3 updated versions that did not include it. And this is after i replied with a self-fixed document the first time.

        But this article really does use them a lot, and thats not the only tell, just a more obvious one.

        I dont know how accurate zerogpt is but i gave it the full text and they returned 100% ai writen, not even a mix.