Source: https://xcancel.com/vxunderground/status/2032600868005310638#m

Yeah, so basically the current prevailing schizo internet theory is that AI nerds have destroyed the internet and created infinite spam.

The advertisement goons are now incapable of determining who is a bot and who is an actual human. The advertisement goons no longer want to pay as much to social media networks.

Social media networks, in full blown panic of losing potential revenue, decided to lobby governments saying “we gotta protect the kids! ID everyone to protect the kids from pedophiles!”.

The social media networks know this doesn’t really protect kids. But, it does two things (and a third accidentally).

  1. They now can identify who is human and who is AI slop machine, or enough to appease the advertisement goons

  2. Advertising to children is a general no-no from politicians, or something, so with ID verification they can say with confidence they’re not advertising to children because it’s been ID verification. Basically, they can weed out the children and focus on advertising to adults

  3. The feds can now tell who is human and who is AI slop. This inadvertently helps them with tracking people and serving fresh daily dumps of propaganda, or whatever they want to do.

It’s a win-win-win for advertisers, social media networks, the government, and any business which does data collections.

It fucks over everyone else.

Chat, I’m not going to lie to you. This is an extremely good conspiracy schizo theory and I unironically believe it.

  • quinnart@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is not a conspiracy. Look at who funded the bill, who wrote it, and who funded the opposition to the bill in each state. Every time one of these passes, each legislating body already has the votes the need to pass before the actual bill material surfaces.

    Meta has reportedly funneled over $65 million into a network of four primary super PACs to manage this state-by-state strategy. While they appear distinct on paper to “scatter filings” and avoid centralized FEC scrutiny, they are managed by the same leadership: Brian Baker (a veteran GOP strategist) and the Democratic consulting firm Hilltop Public Solutions.

    1. American Technology Excellence Project (ATEP): The national “umbrella” super PAC that serves as the primary funding hub.

    2. Forge the Future Project: The GOP-focused arm, active in states like TexasFlorida, and Utah. It frames the legislation as a “parental rights” and “pro-family” issue.

    3. Making Our Tomorrow: The Democratic-focused arm, active in Illinois and California. It frames the same legislation as “tech accountability” and “corporate responsibility.”

    4. Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across California (META PAC): A California-specific PAC focused on protecting Meta’s interests in its home state, particularly regarding AI and child safety regulations.

    The “Shadow” Advocate: Digital Childhood Alliance (DCA)

    The group providing the “boots on the ground” testimony for these bills is the Digital Childhood Alliance. Investigations have found that:

    • Legal Status: The DCA reportedly has no EIN, no IRS registration, and no incorporation records. It is essentially a “ghost organization” or astroturf group.

    • The Meta Link: Internal filings and investigative reports confirmed the DCA is almost entirely funded by Meta, though its website and testimonies never disclose this.

    • The Mission: They are launching Proof-of-Personhood for exactly the reasons specified in this post. By integrating a unique identifier at the OS-level, they are effectively killing the VPN. Soon websites will start requiring that unique identifier to view “adult” content in order to comply with the government.

    How will this data be used? I’ll let you speculate, but let me reassure you that privacy is dead and a bunch of know-nothing geriatric pigs come up with a new way to destroy democracy every day.

  • metermatic26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Conspiracy theory? It’s not, it’s absolutely true. But they left out the bit about the quasi-alliance between big tech and right-wing extremists.

    Tech bro’s want to keep their revenue streams, techno-fascists want to remove privacy barriers that stop them from training AI with your personal data and actual fascists want to crack down on public speech and dissidents.

    The political right in both the US and EU are continuously working to remove privacy and surveillance restrictions under the auspices of free markets and innovation.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    How is this a theory? This is literally what’s happening lol

    Even if it’s not advertising itself pushing it, the rest of what was said is true.

  • kablez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Advertising doesn’t seem like a large enough lever to drive something this globally coordinated.

    My read is that governments and large institutions are preparing for the kind of systemic instability climate change is going to produce.

    Across the world we’re already seeing laws and policies that quietly restrict the ability to organise, protest, or remain anonymous online, while surveillance capabilities expand at the same time. None of this is particularly popular, yet it keeps happening.

    Why?

    Because the next few decades are likely to involve continuous pressure from climate-driven problems: migration, water shortages, falling crop yields, energy instability, and the political conflict that follows when resources get tighter.

    From that perspective, universal ID verification online isn’t mainly about ads or “protecting the kids”. It’s about mapping who is who, who talks to who, and how information spreads.

    If you expect future mass unrest, protest movements, or large-scale political instability, that kind of data becomes extremely valuable.

    And historically, elites often choose to invest more effort in managing the consequences of systemic problems than in solving the underlying causes.

    So instead of “AI spam broke advertising”, the bigger story might be that institutions are building the infrastructure to monitor and manage populations during a much messier future.

  • obey@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    So what every website will have to have age verification? Or else if your website lacks such controls you go to jail?

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eventually every USER will have to be identified on the Internet, to prove their age, so that we know they aren’t children, because we want to protect children.

      So I have to allow everything I say or do on the Internet to be exposed to the entire world, because parents can’t be bothered to supervise their children’s Internet use.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    🧩 Hyper Rationalizing Autistic person here. My condition makes me view reality as systems within systems within systems with infinite recursion.

    I have read this post.

    I have not detected logical inconsistency in this theory… And all the facts that I know seem to support the hypothesis.

    And yes I know I sound like AI. Ironically, AI tools tell me that too. 😅

    If anyone wants to introduce a new premise or fact into the hypothetical scenario, I’ll let you know if it makes sense or not (to me).

    • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Humans are illogical creatures who hype over irrational things. Some random key players pulling strings to heard the mob just a little but no greater strategy exists then “make money by any means possible fuck everyone else”"

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      New premise.

      New datacenters are not for AGI and never have been. The are to support the hyper personalisation of advertising that requires a massive surveillance apparatus and data mining operation.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Correct. But not wholly correct. There are legitimate advancements being made by the serious ppl. But 99% yeah, it’s a smokescreen and everyone sees it coming a mile away, and they think we’re fucking stupid. They have no respect for us, the common people.

        They are too busy robbing their own children of a future metaphorically, and then finishing up by raping and eating said children on the island.

        Why?

        Because:

        is.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If of wasn’t Metas involvement, I was thinking it would be the first stab at a social credit system.

    Is definitely a ploy to identify us all and certainly not to protect children.

  • IratePirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The advertisement goons are now incapable of determining who is a bot and who is an actual human.

    Bullshit. Social networks track the living shit out of everyone and know exactly what’s human traffic and what isn’t. Device identifiers (user agent, IP ranges, browser fingerprint, (lack of) ad id, etc.) and behavioral patterns (including purchase history) differ wildly.

    Advertising to children is a general no-no from politicians, or something,

    Bullshit. Even advertising to kids were outlawed (it isn’t), politicians could be just bought off by advertisers to turn a blind eye. This is particularly true for the land of their formerly free and home of the formerly brave where corruption is now an above-the-counter item, practiced out in the open by the president himself.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bullshit. Social networks track the living shit out of everyone and know exactly what’s human traffic and what isn’t. Device identifiers (user agent, IP ranges, browser fingerprint, (lack of) ad id, etc.) and behavioral patterns (including purchase history) differ wildly.

      https://github.com/xvzc/SpoofDPI plus a browser fingerprinting blocker.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Social networks track the living shit out of everyone and know exactly what’s human traffic and what isn’t.

      Over 80% of Twitter’s accounts are actually bots

      The difference now is that paying advertisers are demanding proof that their adverts are reaching humans, not bots.

      Why are you given adverts for products you’ve just bought? So that paying advertisers can be tricked by the data into thinking their advert resulted in a sale.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The bad news for the AI goons is that the capitalists have squeezed us so hard that we no longer have any money to spend on the products we’re programmed to lust after. Not sure what the end game is.

  • maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    My theory is its war with China. The US has likely alerted other country that China will do to them that the US does to Iran, using social media to guide elections.