Anyone else get confused by the apparent contradiction between the title and the short description?
Here’s a excerpt from the article that accurately describes the AG’s (ridiculous) stance:
[…]according to Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, having a basic phone, or a phone with no data on it, or no phone at all in the year 2024, is evidence of criminal intent.
Anyone else get confused by the apparent contradiction between the title and the short description?
Here’s a excerpt from the article that accurately describes the AG’s (ridiculous) stance:
So the criminally insane are judges in the US. How original.