I quite deliberately tried to err on the side of fixing security issues for that release, and there were some valid (but unusual) use cases that got caught up in the changes.
Seems to me like it was just his own fault. AI may very well have had nothing to do with the regressions, other than maybe not identifying them?
This is something people complaining should remember. AI is good at some parts of the work of a software engineer: the grunt work.
People pointing at new breakages are trying to say “No it isn’t and here’s the proof”.
How do you know those were the result of the AI?
Seems to me like it was just his own fault. AI may very well have had nothing to do with the regressions, other than maybe not identifying them?
He rewrote the test suite to Python using AI tools, which I believe people are saying caused some otherwise detected cases to be missed.