gnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agoSloupinfosec.pubimagemessage-square100linkfedilinkarrow-up11
arrow-up11imageSloupinfosec.pubgnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square100linkfedilink
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoThey didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoDoes that really make a difference?
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoyes. normal usage works as expected
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·30 days agoYes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.
They didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
Does that really make a difference?
yes. normal usage works as expected
Yes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.