snixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSilent anger*lemmy.mlimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1241arrow-down18
arrow-up1233arrow-down1imageSilent anger*lemmy.mlsnixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squareairportline@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down2·1 year ago.webp is a good format. It’s Adobe’s fault for not properly supporting it.
minus-squarehyperdriveguy@vlemmy.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoBetter compression and more features, it’s really nice for reducing website load times
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt takes less download but more CPU to unpack it so the loading time depends on your connection and hardware. In extreme cases it may be worse than png.
.webp is a good format. It’s Adobe’s fault for not properly supporting it.
What’s its advantages?
Better compression and more features, it’s really nice for reducing website load times
It takes less download but more CPU to unpack it so the loading time depends on your connection and hardware. In extreme cases it may be worse than png.
webp: nahhhh
jpegXL: yooooo