I currently have a secondary pool (with raidz2) that I was originally going to use for my important documents, such as storage for Paperless-ngx, as raidz offers corruption detection and repair. The pool is encrypted.

However, I’m concerned about rebuild times (it’s a pool of 4 22TB drives). Is btrfs a better choice for this use case, or should I just go with raidz like I originally planned?

Edit: I should have mentioned that I already have 4-3-2 backups configured - I’m primarily interested in the “self-healing” aspect of ZFS so that I don’t have to recover from backups unless necessary, and to resolve corruption on the fly without me having to notice that a file is corrupt.

  • Zeoic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    uhm, no? Literally none of that was considered AI. Even chatbots, people weren’t calling them AI until LLMs came around and were stuck in them. Lisp is a language USED for AI research, that doesn’t make it AI itself.

    This bot is most definitely not even close to what people consider AI

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      https://www.chessprogramming.org/Artificial_Intelligence

      " the term ‘artificial intelligence’ was coined by John McCarthy in the proposal for the 1956 Dartmouth Conference [4] . In its beginning, Computer Chess was called the Drosophila of Artificial Intelligence. "

      Expert Systems:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_system "In artificial intelligence (AI), an expert system is a computer system emulating the decision-making ability of a human expert.[1] "

      Chatbots in AI:

      https://liacademy.co.uk/the-story-of-eliza-the-ai-that-fooled-the-world/

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Goostman

      Lisp is a language USED for AI research, that doesn’t make it AI itself. “Lisp was an AI language.”

      I didn’t say Lisp was AI. I said it was a language used for AI.

    • David J. Atkinson@c.im
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      @Zeoic You are both correct. Chess was chosen as an early problem domain for work on first-order logic-based programming. That certainly was considered AI. People really interested in chess later abandoned logic programming in favor of brute-force, highly parallel special purpose hardware. That was not AI.

      “Expert systems” (I hate that term) are application area of “Pattern-Directed Inference Systems” (PDIS). Rule-based systems are just one type of PDIS. For example, “Constraint Satisfaction” is another powerful AI technique often used in resource optimization and scheduling systems.