• rajano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Gnome 3 got rid of desktop icons and the menu of Gnome 2, it was also a resource hog. Mate offers what I liked about Gnome 2. Sue me.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Alas, we cannot sue for wrong opinions :/

      I dunno about the resource hog comment especially. I run it on a raspberry pi 5 just fine, and at least compared to mac os and windows 10, it always feels snappier to me on all the hardware I have been able to try multiple options on.

      • rajano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The fact MATE exists is proof I am far from alone in my views. Indeed, this is one of the benefits of FLOS software. Noone is ALLOWED, for example, to create a fork of Windows XP if they want to. Microsoft would quickly stamp down and take to court any attempt to do so. But you and I can both be Linux users who prefer different GUIs. Some of this simply comes down to preference - I prefer GNOME as it was before it was ruined and that is what MATE offers me 😄

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, and I prefer GNOME once it was modernized and made to look like it was not designed by 1990s developers (who are NOT designers, and it shows).

          • rajano@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I care more about functionality than superficial design. I take a similar position in media (TV & film). For example, I love Babylon 5 even though the special effects are admittedly primitive compared to modern science fiction programs. The WRITING and DIRECTION in Babylon 5 is brilliant. I can forgive something superficial if there is substance to it