• RalfWausE_der_zwote@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Be aware that there are still distros out there which *doesn’t * subscribe to that madness… Devuan and Artix to name just two for starters

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          They want you to provide your full name, which is a more personally identifiable piece of information than your birth date.

          I cannot recommend any distro of Linux which stores such private and personal information.

        • Ooops@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Debian daring to suggest that using your real name to identify yourself on the system is a reasonable choice for most people. So get the torches and pitchforks…

          Also don’t tell those people about the fact that such fields for additional information (like real name, address etc) exist in most user-handling parts of their software since forever.

          You get asked for your real name when creating a new user for longer than Linux even exists. It’s just that noone actually cares. But now that’s suddenly an horrific anti privacy policy because the narrative demand that it is.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        I have literally in the thousands of installations I’ve done, literally never once put any genuine information in there. Who does? Why would anyone? Every tech through the ages has asked for your name as a matter of convenience and formality. I don’t know if I have ever put my actual info into any such field in the 40+ years - jeez close to 45 now, that I’ve been using computer tech.

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Why the fuck are they telling you what to do? Computers are servants, not masters.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Are you seriously suggesting that this forces you to enter your actual name?

        The field doesn’t even distinguish between first/last name. It’s just fluff as explained above. It’s also not a systemd thing, or even Debian. This has existed for literally decades, and for just as long people put in whatever the fuck they want.

        But you got so mad you had to make a meme about it.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          But you got so mad you had to make a meme about it.

          Some of you have never been trolled before, and it shows.

          You see, the real_name field has been part of the GECOS field since the 70s. Anyone who has any actual experience with Linux knows this.

          There is some bit of drama about adding birth_date to systemd. The person that I’m responding to appears to subscribe to this drama due to the fact that they’re recommending distros who either don’t use systemd or, even more stupid, ‘fork’ the project to remove that field.

          So, I made a meme from the point of view of one of these people, expressing outrage that Debian is asking for a user’s Real Name… when only a newbie doesn’t know these things.

          And lest you think I’m doing the “I was caught being dumb so I’m claiming to be trolling” here’s a comment of mine from over a month ago making this exact same joke, but more explicitly.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      These aren’t serious. Their mission statements are nothing but childish contrariness.

      E.g. Artix has a “no true Scotsman” right in their tagline about “real” init system. Only 14 year old master debaters will attempt to deny that systemd is a “real” init system with a straight face.

        • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          If you criticize something because of perceived bloat, maybe don’t make it the mouse in your metaphor.

          And no, it’s a great init system that has all the features one wants. That’s why it ended up taking over: it was the first really good init system that introduced actual dependencies and so on.

          • Magiilaro@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            That is so true. For me, who works as a Systemadministrator, systemd is about the best thing that happened to linux in a long time! It makes my work so much easier

            • Brummbaer@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              That’s what the problem with systemd is. It started out as a “modern” init system but somehow we ended up with some kind of parasitic software heap that tries to replace the userspace.

              I mean the latest addition is some kind of OS installer.

              To quote James T. Kirk: “why does an init system need an OS installer.”

              • Magiilaro@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                I fear you missunderstood me: I think systemd with all the integrated features and tools is great, having all the features and tools is such a huge benefit for a professionell sysadmin who has to connect to and administrate lots of customer server every day.

                But that is my opinion, I fully accept that people don’t like systemd and that’s the great thing with Linux: If you don’t like a component then you are free to drop it and use something else. So have fun with your systemd free systems!

                • Brummbaer@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  I’m totally with you on that. I use systemd daily and it has enormous benefits for system administration, but I don’t like the direction it’s headed and how the project is lead. That’s what I wanted to bring across here.

          • RalfWausE_der_zwote@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            It took only over because it was pushed by big tech and its bootlickers

            In the company I work for NO system uses Systemd and it will stay this way until someone takes my model m keyboard from my cold dead hands!

            • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              Your conspiracy myth is wrong, and if you actually care about what’s true, you can confirm what I say very easily for yourself:

              Just go to the mailing list archives and forums and follow the decision making discussions of the time. E.g. Arch Linux. This will quickly and decisively convince you that “big tech” had nothing to do with it.

              But you don’t care about the truth, do you? You just want the comfortable position of being able to look down on all the mainstream fools.