That’s their citation standards they also have a page that says Wikipedia should not cite itself. One time I vandalized a random article by changing how old a river was. I was banned from editing for 3 years
And still the one party state need to rapidly industrialize was a driving cause. We can’t forget about the anti-intellectual polices can we?
That’s their citation standards they also have a page that says Wikipedia should not cite itself.
Again what they say about themselves is irrelevant. The fact is they constantly cite RFA, scumbag frauds like Montefiore and other entirely unreliable or dare I say dogshit sources. The fact they say they really don’t doesn’t change that.
We can’t forget about the anti-intellectual polices can we?
What do you think lacking agronomic knowledge means? Are you a complete fucking idiot or have you not been reading what I’ve been saying?
And still the one party state need to rapidly industrialize was a driving cause.
And still this is meaningless words salad that says nothing about what actually caused the famine. Which was again lacking agronomic knowledge, natural disaster and poor reporting traditions.
No it’s that the party promoted anti intellectual polices not just a lack of knowledge.
The one party state, which was a byproduct of the revolution, led numerous terrible policies due to absolute authority of the party. I.e eliminate sparrows campaign, the four pest campaign in general, and overall inefficiency in a planned economy.
No it’s that the party promoted anti intellectual polices not just a lack of knowledge.
What do you think leads people to promoting anti intellectual policy? Maybe the fact they lacked the knowledge to promote effective policy at the time due to the country being mostly made up of illiterate peasants? How are you this much of an idiot? Do you not think anything through before you post?
inefficiency in a planned economy.
So inefficient it brought the USSR from backwater to superpower in under 50 years and did the same for China. Ronald Reagan is that you?
eliminate sparrows campaign, the four pest campaign
And again we’re back to lacking agronomic knowledge etc etc. 🤦♂️ 😮💨
I understand you have an ideological conviction and years of western chauvinism that are forcing you to try twist this but genuinely the levels of idiocy you are going to is amazing.
Honestly I don’t think the semantics of it are overly important is it technically anti intellectual if you simply don’t know better probably not but was the wide roll out without real testing anti intellectual possibly, but in the end it all comes down to the 3 core factors which were the natural disasters, immense lack of agronomic knowledge, and poor reporting traditions what exactly you call them is not as important I think.
That’s their citation standards they also have a page that says Wikipedia should not cite itself. One time I vandalized a random article by changing how old a river was. I was banned from editing for 3 years
And still the one party state need to rapidly industrialize was a driving cause. We can’t forget about the anti-intellectual polices can we?
Again what they say about themselves is irrelevant. The fact is they constantly cite RFA, scumbag frauds like Montefiore and other entirely unreliable or dare I say dogshit sources. The fact they say they really don’t doesn’t change that.
What do you think lacking agronomic knowledge means? Are you a complete fucking idiot or have you not been reading what I’ve been saying?
And still this is meaningless words salad that says nothing about what actually caused the famine. Which was again lacking agronomic knowledge, natural disaster and poor reporting traditions.
No it’s that the party promoted anti intellectual polices not just a lack of knowledge.
The one party state, which was a byproduct of the revolution, led numerous terrible policies due to absolute authority of the party. I.e eliminate sparrows campaign, the four pest campaign in general, and overall inefficiency in a planned economy.
What do you think leads people to promoting anti intellectual policy? Maybe the fact they lacked the knowledge to promote effective policy at the time due to the country being mostly made up of illiterate peasants? How are you this much of an idiot? Do you not think anything through before you post?
So inefficient it brought the USSR from backwater to superpower in under 50 years and did the same for China. Ronald Reagan is that you?
And again we’re back to lacking agronomic knowledge etc etc. 🤦♂️ 😮💨
I understand you have an ideological conviction and years of western chauvinism that are forcing you to try twist this but genuinely the levels of idiocy you are going to is amazing.
Can it be called anti intellectual by not having the necessary knowledge?
The sparrow thing was a fiasco but was based on something no? They had a hypothesis and test it.
Honestly I don’t think the semantics of it are overly important is it technically anti intellectual if you simply don’t know better probably not but was the wide roll out without real testing anti intellectual possibly, but in the end it all comes down to the 3 core factors which were the natural disasters, immense lack of agronomic knowledge, and poor reporting traditions what exactly you call them is not as important I think.