• Striker@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ceiling looks incomplete with no wall and the color scheme is drab and dreary.

      • akilou@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For large chains in the suburbs this is totally normal. They’re basically warehouses in a sea of parking lots filled with shelves and racks. Sometimes there’s carpeted areas in between the tile walkways or displays that go up high enough that it feels enclosed. For smaller or more urban stores, you don’t see this kind of construction.

      • Mamertine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re in a Walmart.

        They claim to be cheaper so they can have that drabby distopian look.

        In the good parts of town, they look nicer. In the poor parts of town they’re legit worse than that.

        Fwiw, I’ll pay the extra dollar per shopping cart for the superior look of a target. Target is generally cleaner and crisper looking. As always there are exceptions to that rule.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Target has been going downhill. Lots of crap in the aisles now, and inventory is stocked during the day. It’s like shopping in a warehouse.

          • Chocrates@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Retail in general is hiring much less staff these days so they always look like shit. I heard on the radio that they are removing self checkout now too because of theft? I doubt they will increase staff back up to compensate. I kind of want to be there in rush hour the first time to watch the shit show.

            • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The economics of removing self checkout are not there. You check 6 customers per attendant at self checkout - the store would need to lose $150,000 in merchandise at self check out per year to break even (assuming $30k/yr for the wage slave).

              • Mamertine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                In a previous life, I did loss prevention. The average shrink rate in retail in the USA is 2%. That means 2% of the merchandise leaves the store without being paid for.

                An average Walmart does millions in sales each day. Conservatively 2% of one million is $20,000.

                Thousands of dollars of unpaid merchandise leaves a big retailer every single day. It’s part of the cost of doing business. That’s also why online retailers are cheaper. They don’t have to deal with external theft. They still have internal theft.

                Shrink is the industry term. It’s merchandise that isn’t paid for and isn’t there when inventory happens. Theft is most of it, both by customers (external) and employees (internal). It’s also things that aren’t rang up right at the register, damaged merchandise that isn’t removed from the system correctly. It’s a big umbrella term.