• luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    He ignored comments from our admins explicitly telling him he’s wrong, because it went against his narrative.

    Idk, sounds to me like you’re equally ignoring comments from other parties telling you you’re wrong because it goes against your narrative too. “We investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing” is hardly an argument.

    That’s why this is a slugfest: "You’re wrong! “No, you’re wrong!” “No, we told you you’re wrong!” “Your telling me that I was wrong was also wrong!”

    Reasserting conflicting claims like they’re facts isn’t worth jack shit.

    • Loco_Mex@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Except they acted accountably and made efforts to fix the other sides grievances even if they didn’t agree.

      Something that has not been returned and has only been met with increasing hostility.

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I admit I don’t know the whole story. I don’t know what evidence was produced to support the LLM claim and what efforts were made.

        The few comments I read here seemed like some attempt to reconcile were made but fell apart. I can’t and don’t want to point fingers one way or the other, personal bias notwithstanding.

        I just wanted to point out “he said something even though we said it’s wrong” isn’t a particularly strong argument. That’s just one party’s word against the other’s.