• midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ve never heard con as short for convict, but I also don’t hang out with police very much. I don’t think I would call it common usage though

    Edit: I take this back slightly, I have heard of excons in place of exconvicts, but not ‘cons’ or con on its own.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      A con is fairly common parlance for a career criminal. I’m surprised you’ve never heard it used that way.

      • midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Even if we take that definition though the joke isn’t really good though. Why would the police need drawings of convicts? Drawings are used when the police don’t know who committed a crime.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The definition for con is broad enough to encompass anyone with any relation to having done crime. They don’t have to be convicted. Ex-con, though, does require conviction and serving out the sentence.

          • midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Can you give an example sentence for ‘cons’? “This city is full of cons.” “Some cons came and stole a cig right out of my mouth.” Something like that?