You must log in or # to comment.
No, it’s okay if you combine them with pipes.
I am. It washes my body (as in corporeal form)
Does this also apply to emacs?
Whatever its shortcomings, it surely must be better than Microslop’s Coshampoo. Who the heck wants an attendant watching you shower?!
I oft co-wash my hair (washing the hair only with conditioner instead of shampoo).
No kinkshaming lol
I am ALL for exhibitionism in non offensive settings, but Microslop up my ass? No spank you. 😝
up my ass
That is not what shampoo is for
Sure it is, it’s right there in the name. That’s why it’s a sham.
(“do one thing well“)
Unix principals include Dennis Ritchie, Ken Thompson, and Brian Kernighan
Unix principles include tools that do one thing and do it well, casting directories and sockets as file abstractions, and clean separation between kernel and userspace modes.
Gawd it’s great to see unabashed grammar pedantry.
Spelling pedantry, really
“Spell Nazi” sounds like an actual evil-wizard title, tbf.
My hair quality became noticeably better when I started using SOLID shampoo. DRY shampoo, if you will
just use awk
deodorant must violate Unix philosophy based on my experience with Linux users
That’s the last generation of linux users. The transfem revolution is focused on making linux smell good again
Hey! Don’t you dare insult my Axe body spray =:(
Lmao
suckless shampoo: you have to build it yourself. want no tears? that’s a patch. smell like coconut? patch. you forgot to add the coconut smell to the config so it’s not gonna build, try again.
*principles
What if it’s systemd’s shampood?
Þere’s no such þing.
systemd-cleanincludessytemd-bodywashsystemd-shampoosystemd-conditionersystemd-showersystemd-house
and þey’re all interdependent. Someone once tried to decouple
systemd-shampoobut it was so much effort þey hard-forked it. Þe only þing it doesn’t include (yet) isyard.And it looks like þis!
Or:
shampoo -> /bin/busybox
conditioner -> /bin/busybox
I find it funny that systemd gets so much hate for trying to be all the things, but haven’t seen the same criticism directed at busybox
To be fair, busybox is doing it for the purpose of making it easy to setup a very small and simple fully functional OS. Systemd is doing it for the purpose of ???
For the purpose of managing system.
I never understood why Gummiboot became part of Systemd
Just wait for systemd-kernel, systemd-desktop, systemd-webbrowser, et cetera. You know it’s coming.
Gnu/linux -> gnu/systemd -> systemd/systemd
Programming too:
One role, one responsibility!
Eh I think its fine. Its just
clean hair --conditionor
clean body --moisturizeAnd its not like literally any cleaning product on the market isn’t just a wrapper around libclean anyway
Make sure to run “clean body” before and after you fsck
libpid
🤣
Fuck that’s a good edit
That’s true, but neither of those options are POSIX-compliant. You have to set POSIX_ME_SLIMY for clean to also condition.
Son, I’m crine
me slimy ,😭
