• mogoh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Arch is about telling other people what you use. If you use gentoo, you can take way more pride in you installation.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      After restarting the installation for the 5th time, and wasting 5 hours compiling the kernel each time, you should be proud you finally can type on the TTY.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Arch is pourover coffee; Gentoo is those ridiculous Rube Goldberg setups that take 45 minutes to make a single cup. Both are for hipsters.

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Ubuntu is that shitty Keurig machine with big plastic pods, but they call them “snaps”.

        • Sips'@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Does that make Debian standard filter coffee? The coffee everyone can get behind 🫶

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’d argue that there’s literally no difference in difficulty of installing Arch vs Gentoo vs LFS. The only difference lies in the convenience of package management. Arch is very convenient, everything is preinstalled. Gentoo is more time consuming. LFS makes you be the package manager. Which isn’t really difficult, all programs clearly state which dependencies they have, but it’s just much more time consuming.