Exactly. Since n is represented by the collection of clothes, it is O(1) if you are only going through a finite subset of the clothes. If everything is in the closet, and in no particular order, you would then do O(n) because you potentially have to go through the entire collection to find one article of clothing.

It gets even worse if your idea of organization is placing the clothes neatly yet with no real order in a closet with multiple drawers and containers inside. In this last scenario you get O(n²) because you now have to repeatedly search through n numbers of clothing containers.

This is like the idea of having sex on the beach. Who really wants that. You didn’t think it through if you want that. Do you really want to invite sand and salmonella to the mix?

I feel like the residential grade table with kitchen swivel counter stools is more out of place despite not looking entirely off. Do they really put stuff like that, which will instantly rust and fall apart on California beaches? The rest of the image has more understandable outdoor furniture.

Clients will have intellectual rights on anything produced for them. Removal of that data from their systems and storing it elsewhere will be a violation.

Using your own equipment other than maybe your monitor, mouse, or keyboard will be a no go. I don’t know of any serious workplace that would let you do otherwise.

Even if you are a self employed contractor you will need to remote in to their virtual environment and work in that.

You say that, but a “conservative” friend, who has been voting on the left as of late, claims the shooter was on the left because of trans connections and “It doesn’t make sense the right would shoot their own.” I brought up the subset of groypers that helps explain it, but this was rejected and it was suggested I was blind to the truth by my biases and there was no convincing him.