• treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    3 and 4 by a mile, are you kidding? Everyone picking 2 doesn’t lay awake at night cringing at past memories.

    • oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was wavering between 1-3 and 1-4 but

      Languages are a SKILL THAT CAN BE PRACTICED!

    • Fester@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      2 and 6, so I can still get a good night’s sleep after 8 straight hours of cringing.

    • Nurgle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      6 basically increases your lifespan by a 1/3. So if you would have normally lived to 75 you get to 100.

      • 𝜏au@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sounds like it would make things like surgery with general anesthesia impossible though.

        Edit: Now that I think about it, wouldn’t 4 be better since it makes you functionally immortal? Dying from old age just means dying due to some of those health conditions (heart disease, cancer etc.) that get more and more likely the older you get. If you can’t get those, you don’t die of old age.

        • Nurgle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Felt like perfect health was just like you’re never sick, never get a cavity, yada yada as these are all kind of lowkey powers

          • Unanimous_anonymous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I agree that immortal probably isn’t accurate in my opinion. It depends on how liberal you interpret the term “healthy”. Is a stab wound bad health? Is decapitation bad health? I’d argue no, but there is a (weak imo) argument that it is.

            • oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              A stab wound on good health heals better than a stab wound on bad health. Any injuries short of death is still better in a healthy body. I would not want a scratch on a diabetic body. And even if immortality is not on the table, severe chronic illness makes aging disgraceful.

              • Unanimous_anonymous@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t disagree, but my point was a stab wound on a “healthy” versus “unhealthy” body is still a stab wound. If you’re able to be injured, the only way you’d be immortal is if you can regenerate from anything. That wasn’t part of the “perfect health”, so I’m assuming “perfect health” is not immortality like some of the others suggested.

      • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        More than that. If time stops around you, you can sleep in every day. You’ll probably get more than 8 hours each night. Plus your stress will go down, and your health will go up. Both leading to a longer life. If you even used a small portion of your normal sleeping time toward physical activity, you could get very healthy.