I don’t know if this is 100% strictly privacy related but I think it does fall in the sphere of protecting one’s right to express oneself privately.

"Government officials have drawn up deeply controversial proposals to broaden the definition of extremism to include anyone who “undermines” the country’s institutions and its values, according to documents seen by the Observer.

The new definition, prepared by civil servants working for cabinet minister Michael Gove, is fiercely opposed by a cohort of officials who fear legitimate groups and individuals will be branded extremists.

The proposals have provoked a furious response from civil rights groups with some warning it risks “criminalising dissent”, and would significantly suppress freedom of expression."

    • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      don’t take too kindly to hundreds of thousands of Muslim terrorists, and Islamic terrorist supporters marching through their streets

      Hundreds of thousands of terrorists marched through the streets? Lol.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      Countries which fought the Nazi Reich, at great cost, which have been hit with massive Muslim Terrorist attacks don’t take too kindly to hundreds of thousands of Muslim terrorists, and Islamic terrorist supporters marching through their streets screaming “Kill All The Jews”

      Citation needed for the bolded bit. I must have missed the coverage of this event.

        • be_excellent_to_each_other
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          I know I know - asking for citations is my standard response for folks of that ilk. Magas get the same treatment.

          Generally they reply with nothing but the sound of crickets.